I wanted so desperately to comment on R but as you may have noticed, I’ve been in an intense dogfight with two of their members and I didn’t want to hurt ST’s chances of expanding his base.
I’m going to try and parachute in – just long enough – to post “Advent-meets-#metoo”, sometime later today/tomorrow; will preview it here, first, for revisions/comments, etc.
“Simon is fun. That is why so many women like him, and he is fun because he doesnât couch his speech so as not to offend the ladies. Some may accuse him of being disrespectful towards women; I vehemently disagree. His attitude is actually far more respectful of women than yours is, and I am really not trying to attack you here, but âupset the womenfolkâ? Really, dude?”
I just found this on an old Ratburger thread. You hit the nail on the head, Judith. Simon may be outrageous, but he is funny as hell and not the least bit condescending or patronizing like a couple of men on that site I’d like to take out if I was physically capable.
I’m beginning to think that it is not enough for incels to wallow in their own insecurities. In order to have any shot at the womenfolk they de-platform the real men because, you know, women are attracted to us.
Their participation on those blogs is not about discussing the topics of the day. No, they use the internet to build their own egos and mentally masturbate one another.
Under normal circumstances, I would think you sound like an egomaniac, but considering the hostility that exists towards you, your explanation may well be correct. I don’t know how else to explain it.
Be careful what you wish for! I feared a barrage of hostility toward both JaC anD ST, but lo, the tone of the comments is almost elegiac! 2 or 3 of the high priests of Rb masculinity actually endorsed it!
BUT: we Simonettes have had it all our own way on this site..Cover up , gals, those gents are going to be peering in on us! đđ
With the inexplicable exception of the one known as “Hyp,” they are even more infantile and vociferate in their attacks on females who refuse to bow down and worship their big, strong man-brains.
Wakey wakey! This has been very interesting. Judy wanted to take responsibility for you being banned, or at least apologize for her part in it. At first the comments were all, like, yeah, we always liked him, he is brilliant, we wish him well, etc…..but then it seemed a lot of people thought they, and they alone, knew the ârealâ reason it happened, and people started squabbling over that! You are a man of mystery! My best friend was a guy like that: nobody was simply indifferent to him.
All I can say is, I just knew, back when I saw the ban, that the saga hadnât ended. Stay tuned!
My sincere desire is that none of the Simonettes are negatively impacted by all of this. JaC realizes that her stance has put her in their sights again.
May ya’ll enjoy fair winds and following seas from now until forever.
Hi ET đ my user name over there is Judy Campbell, I am pretty sure? But if that doesn’t work, just ask Simon or Nanda to give you my email-they both have it đ
Well, as of now the thread in the Mischief has turned vile. It was going quite well until it turned to the issue of men crying. (Iâm sorry I commented on that. I didnât know about the original,post, and I still donât see what it had to do with JaCâs post.) But itâs clear that we Simonettes are never going to be alone in here again. Weâre going to be called out over there for whatever we say in here, and not in a pleasant way. âMeddlesome old womanâ? That is just gratuitously contemptuous. And contempt is very often fatal to any communication. I hope everybody on both sites can let this shit lie till it cools off.
Good point and I’ll add I resent anyone criticizing the freedom of expression ST’s site has afforded. He may like to describe himself as a “bad boy,” but- at the risk of offending his wonderfully macho sense of self-expression- he’s a very nice boy. đ
It has now reached the point where theyâre trying to justify, again, what seemed to me at the time to be a precipitous decision to ban him. âLook, heâs calling us âincels!â â. Ei yii yii! Iâm with JJ: this has an unreal, dreamlike quality, like when a character from one TV sitcom appears in a different series. May it all end well, or at least, end! Cuz I love and need both sites.
It is appropriate time to make a few plans for the future and it’s time to be happy. I’ve learn this post and if I could I desire to counsel you some attention-grabbing issues or advice. Perhaps you can write subsequent articles relating to this article. I want to learn more things approximately it!
Thank you so much, ET đ
LikeLiked by 3 people
Recall, JaC, that the Biblical Judith is a warrior-queen: Kudos to you for what you’ve written and done with this!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks, Nanda đ
LikeLiked by 2 people
You’ve earned it, JaC!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wanted so desperately to comment on R but as you may have noticed, I’ve been in an intense dogfight with two of their members and I didn’t want to hurt ST’s chances of expanding his base.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I’m going to try and parachute in – just long enough – to post “Advent-meets-#metoo”, sometime later today/tomorrow; will preview it here, first, for revisions/comments, etc.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Judith, I lied. Pls forgive. I couldn’t resist commenting:
“Heâs outrageously blunt and original. Whatâs not to like?” đ
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Simon is fun. That is why so many women like him, and he is fun because he doesnât couch his speech so as not to offend the ladies. Some may accuse him of being disrespectful towards women; I vehemently disagree. His attitude is actually far more respectful of women than yours is, and I am really not trying to attack you here, but âupset the womenfolkâ? Really, dude?”
I just found this on an old Ratburger thread. You hit the nail on the head, Judith. Simon may be outrageous, but he is funny as hell and not the least bit condescending or patronizing like a couple of men on that site I’d like to take out if I was physically capable.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you ET, you crack me up đ
LikeLiked by 1 person
Simon,
Try to capitalize on that “girl power” and find some more fun babes to contribute to the site.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m beginning to think that it is not enough for incels to wallow in their own insecurities. In order to have any shot at the womenfolk they de-platform the real men because, you know, women are attracted to us.
Their participation on those blogs is not about discussing the topics of the day. No, they use the internet to build their own egos and mentally masturbate one another.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Under normal circumstances, I would think you sound like an egomaniac, but considering the hostility that exists towards you, your explanation may well be correct. I don’t know how else to explain it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree because they not only care to de-platform alpha males but alpha females as well. They’re insecure about everybody. You’re not alone.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Be careful what you wish for! I feared a barrage of hostility toward both JaC anD ST, but lo, the tone of the comments is almost elegiac! 2 or 3 of the high priests of Rb masculinity actually endorsed it!
BUT: we Simonettes have had it all our own way on this site..Cover up , gals, those gents are going to be peering in on us! đđ
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yes, the intuitive host has already made it a point to highlight this post to Ratburger readers. Didn’t take long!
LikeLiked by 2 people
With the inexplicable exception of the one known as “Hyp,” they are even more infantile and vociferate in their attacks on females who refuse to bow down and worship their big, strong man-brains.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Did you just slap a target on my back?! đ
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think and hope not. The intent was to insulate you from attack.
You should be safe now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wakey wakey! This has been very interesting. Judy wanted to take responsibility for you being banned, or at least apologize for her part in it. At first the comments were all, like, yeah, we always liked him, he is brilliant, we wish him well, etc…..but then it seemed a lot of people thought they, and they alone, knew the ârealâ reason it happened, and people started squabbling over that! You are a man of mystery! My best friend was a guy like that: nobody was simply indifferent to him.
All I can say is, I just knew, back when I saw the ban, that the saga hadnât ended. Stay tuned!
LikeLiked by 2 people
My sincere desire is that none of the Simonettes are negatively impacted by all of this. JaC realizes that her stance has put her in their sights again.
May ya’ll enjoy fair winds and following seas from now until forever.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey Judy,
Was trying to send you a PM over at R but couldn’t get a user valid name id to send it. If possible, could I get that?
Thanks, ET
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi ET đ my user name over there is Judy Campbell, I am pretty sure? But if that doesn’t work, just ask Simon or Nanda to give you my email-they both have it đ
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi ET, I see that I actually have your email from a group email that was sent-would it be ok if I wrote to you through that email address?
LikeLiked by 2 people
But of course!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, as of now the thread in the Mischief has turned vile. It was going quite well until it turned to the issue of men crying. (Iâm sorry I commented on that. I didnât know about the original,post, and I still donât see what it had to do with JaCâs post.) But itâs clear that we Simonettes are never going to be alone in here again. Weâre going to be called out over there for whatever we say in here, and not in a pleasant way. âMeddlesome old womanâ? That is just gratuitously contemptuous. And contempt is very often fatal to any communication. I hope everybody on both sites can let this shit lie till it cools off.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Good point and I’ll add I resent anyone criticizing the freedom of expression ST’s site has afforded. He may like to describe himself as a “bad boy,” but- at the risk of offending his wonderfully macho sense of self-expression- he’s a very nice boy. đ
LikeLiked by 2 people
It has now reached the point where theyâre trying to justify, again, what seemed to me at the time to be a precipitous decision to ban him. âLook, heâs calling us âincels!â â. Ei yii yii! Iâm with JJ: this has an unreal, dreamlike quality, like when a character from one TV sitcom appears in a different series. May it all end well, or at least, end! Cuz I love and need both sites.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks so much to both Hypatia and ET for the supportive comments over on that thread!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, actually the obloquy was directed more at you than at Simon. Mosâly…….
LikeLiked by 1 person
The mob begins to form. The Warrior Queen is in jeopardy of banishment from the RatKingdom.
P.S. The name of a particular ‘legacy site’ begins to make more sense. Credit where credit is due, the founders were prescient.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Warrior Queen/ Susan B. Anthony is in far less jeopardy than I. I just told Haakon Dahl to “get a pair.”
Simon, after our previous conversation, you where I’m coming with this one.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It is appropriate time to make a few plans for the future and it’s time to be happy. I’ve learn this post and if I could I desire to counsel you some attention-grabbing issues or advice. Perhaps you can write subsequent articles relating to this article. I want to learn more things approximately it!
LikeLike
You need to take part in a contest for one of the finest sites online. I’m going to recommend this blog!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow! Please do it, Buffy. That is about the nicest thing I have heard all day.
Please do not be a stranger. The water is warm. Please feel free to join in on our conversations sometimes. We don’t bite.
LikeLike