34 thoughts on “To Judith

  1. I wanted so desperately to comment on R but as you may have noticed, I’ve been in an intense dogfight with two of their members and I didn’t want to hurt ST’s chances of expanding his base.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. I’m going to try and parachute in – just long enough – to post “Advent-meets-#metoo”, sometime later today/tomorrow; will preview it here, first, for revisions/comments, etc.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. “Simon is fun. That is why so many women like him, and he is fun because he doesn’t couch his speech so as not to offend the ladies. Some may accuse him of being disrespectful towards women; I vehemently disagree. His attitude is actually far more respectful of women than yours is, and I am really not trying to attack you here, but “upset the womenfolk”? Really, dude?”

    I just found this on an old Ratburger thread. You hit the nail on the head, Judith. Simon may be outrageous, but he is funny as hell and not the least bit condescending or patronizing like a couple of men on that site I’d like to take out if I was physically capable.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I’m beginning to think that it is not enough for incels to wallow in their own insecurities. In order to have any shot at the womenfolk they de-platform the real men because, you know, women are attracted to us.

      Their participation on those blogs is not about discussing the topics of the day. No, they use the internet to build their own egos and mentally masturbate one another.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Under normal circumstances, I would think you sound like an egomaniac, but considering the hostility that exists towards you, your explanation may well be correct. I don’t know how else to explain it.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I agree because they not only care to de-platform alpha males but alpha females as well. They’re insecure about everybody. You’re not alone.

        Liked by 3 people

  4. Be careful what you wish for! I feared a barrage of hostility toward both JaC anD ST, but lo, the tone of the comments is almost elegiac! 2 or 3 of the high priests of Rb masculinity actually endorsed it!
    BUT: we Simonettes have had it all our own way on this site..Cover up , gals, those gents are going to be peering in on us! 😂😜

    Liked by 3 people

  5. With the inexplicable exception of the one known as “Hyp,” they are even more infantile and vociferate in their attacks on females who refuse to bow down and worship their big, strong man-brains.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Wakey wakey! This has been very interesting. Judy wanted to take responsibility for you being banned, or at least apologize for her part in it. At first the comments were all, like, yeah, we always liked him, he is brilliant, we wish him well, etc…..but then it seemed a lot of people thought they, and they alone, knew the “real” reason it happened, and people started squabbling over that! You are a man of mystery! My best friend was a guy like that: nobody was simply indifferent to him.
      All I can say is, I just knew, back when I saw the ban, that the saga hadn’t ended. Stay tuned!

      Liked by 2 people

      1. My sincere desire is that none of the Simonettes are negatively impacted by all of this. JaC realizes that her stance has put her in their sights again.

        May ya’ll enjoy fair winds and following seas from now until forever.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi ET 🙂 my user name over there is Judy Campbell, I am pretty sure? But if that doesn’t work, just ask Simon or Nanda to give you my email-they both have it 🙂

      Liked by 2 people

  6. Well, as of now the thread in the Mischief has turned vile. It was going quite well until it turned to the issue of men crying. (I’m sorry I commented on that. I didn’t know about the original,post, and I still don’t see what it had to do with JaC’s post.) But it’s clear that we Simonettes are never going to be alone in here again. We’re going to be called out over there for whatever we say in here, and not in a pleasant way. “Meddlesome old woman”? That is just gratuitously contemptuous. And contempt is very often fatal to any communication. I hope everybody on both sites can let this shit lie till it cools off.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. Good point and I’ll add I resent anyone criticizing the freedom of expression ST’s site has afforded. He may like to describe himself as a “bad boy,” but- at the risk of offending his wonderfully macho sense of self-expression- he’s a very nice boy. 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

    1. It has now reached the point where they’re trying to justify, again, what seemed to me at the time to be a precipitous decision to ban him. “Look, he’s calling us ‘incels!’ “. Ei yii yii! I’m with JJ: this has an unreal, dreamlike quality, like when a character from one TV sitcom appears in a different series. May it all end well, or at least, end! Cuz I love and need both sites.

      Liked by 2 people

  8. The mob begins to form. The Warrior Queen is in jeopardy of banishment from the RatKingdom.

    P.S. The name of a particular ‘legacy site’ begins to make more sense. Credit where credit is due, the founders were prescient.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The Warrior Queen/ Susan B. Anthony is in far less jeopardy than I. I just told Haakon Dahl to “get a pair.”

      Simon, after our previous conversation, you where I’m coming with this one.

      Liked by 2 people

  9. It is appropriate time to make a few plans for the future and it’s time to be happy. I’ve learn this post and if I could I desire to counsel you some attention-grabbing issues or advice. Perhaps you can write subsequent articles relating to this article. I want to learn more things approximately it!

    Like

    1. Wow! Please do it, Buffy. That is about the nicest thing I have heard all day.

      Please do not be a stranger. The water is warm. Please feel free to join in on our conversations sometimes. We don’t bite.

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.