Chaps here, JaC…A couple different ways we can think about this: In the language of Jesusâ time, âSon of Manâ meant âhuman being/myselfâ. âOne like us in all things but sin.â says Scripture. Fully human. That approach concentrates on one word in the phrase (Man); another focuses on the other word (Son). If we remember that the Father calls Jesus his Son – at the Baptism by John, at the Transfiguration on Mt. Tabor – in the Gospels, we have another clue. Jesus is the Son of God; He is âGod with a human faceâ, some writers have said. So, itâs a way for Jesus to tell us that he is fully human and fully divine. Hope this helps!
Chaps here, JaC…A couple different ways we can think about this: In the language of Jesusâ time, âSon of Manâ meant âhuman being/myselfâ. âOne like us in all things but sin.â says Scripture. Fully human. That approach concentrates on one word in the phrase (Man); another focuses on the other word (Son). If we remember that the Father calls Jesus his Son – at the Baptism by John, at the Transfiguration on Mt. Tabor – in the Gospels, we have another clue. Jesus is the Son of God; He is âGod with a human faceâ, some writers have said. So, itâs a way for Jesus to tell us that he is fully human and fully divine. Hope this helps!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Nanda đ
LikeLiked by 2 people
Most welcome!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think itâs because in the Bible, angels are referred to as âthe sons of Godâ. So this was to stress His human provenance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Hypatia đ
LikeLike