1st LAI Takes Friendly Fire

“Can you tell us how they describe the event? I have not read that book or read any accounts of that event outside official and classified military documents.”

As promised, ST, here’s the account from: “Desert Storm: A Forgotten War”:

RAS AL-KHAFJI AND OTHER MAJOR GROUND ACTIONS
(29/30 JAN 1991)

“The first attack occurred in the west; units of the U.S. Marine First Light Armored Infantry Battalion (LAI) engaged the Iraqi forces, calling in artillery and close air support from AH-1 Cobra helicopters, AV-8 Harriers, and A-10 Warthogs in addition to using their own TOWs mounted on LAVs. At about the same time, another LAI battalion repulsed the probe coming from al-Wafra.

The LAI was meant to be a reconnaissance and screening force, and was not designed to stop attacks by heavy armor; thus it had no armor, although it had anti-tank weapons. Nevertheless the LAI succeeded in stopping the Iraqi attacks, and the LAV performed very well its first time in combat. By the time the fighting ended, some 33 Iraqi tanks and 29 APCs had been destroyed. Eleven U.S. soldiers were killed in two friendly fire incidents. One involved a Maverick missile launched from an A-10 Warthog: the missile lost its intended target and instead destroyed an LAV, killing seven soldiers; four others were killed by friendly ground fire.”

Alberto Bin; Richard Hill; Archer Jones. Desert Storm: A Forgotten War [Praeger Publishing, 1998, Pp. 128-129] (Kindle Locations 1943-1946). Kindle Edition.

26 thoughts on “1st LAI Takes Friendly Fire

  1. LAI was rightly name changed to LAR (Light Armored Recon) after Persian Gulf I. The LAV is very thin-skinned and its occupants are extremely vulnerable. It is better suited for “stealthy” missions.

    The LAV performed well in Panama first, but our tactics were battle-tested for the first time in Kuwait. We did remarkably well. Most of our casualties came to the mothers of America courtesy of the US Air Force.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. ST, this is difficult to wrap my brain around – and impossible to wrap my heart around! Un abrazo to you and to the fallen. Where would we find their names/more about them?💔

    Liked by 2 people

      1. I’m just relating reactions, to an incident that involved you, and your comrades in something unthinkable. I felt the same way when you linked to the book a while back.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. OK, then….I guess we’ve gone as far as possible with this, without my becoming an irritant; which is certainly not my intent. I need to sleep, anyway. Chao for now. Peace,…out.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Don’t poke the bear, D’Nanda, please.

        I don’t even see the bear; I have no desire to be near/disturb said bear, let alone *poke* it, for goodness’ sake. I’m sorry if questions were/are intrusive, and withdraw them, if so….Meantime, life is getting hectic at the office, and I’ll be holding down the desk for the next two weeks, so I’ll be here intermittently. Ongoing projects here will be wrapped up during that time, too. I’ll post them when complete.

        Peace be within and among us….

        Liked by 1 person

  3. “The LAI was meant to be a reconnaissance and screening force, and was not designed to stop attacks by heavy armor; thus it had no armor, although it had anti-tank weapons. Nevertheless the LAI succeeded in stopping the Iraqi attacks, and the LAV performed very well its first time in combat. By the time the fighting ended, some 33 Iraqi tanks and 29 APCs had been destroyed.”

    This is amazing: in this particular altercation, the Iraqis massively outgunned the Marines, but the Marines won anyway. God Bless the U.S. Marines.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. The Iraqis knew that the Marines didn’t have the weaponry the Iraqis had, and the Iraqis ended up getting their asses handed to them: Awesome.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. US Marines’ Light Armored Vehicles (LAVs) tactics, techniques, and procedures had never been tested in combat formation. They were developed by a bunch of LTs and me. We got the LAV because the US Army developed it then decided they didn’t want it. Marines saw an opportunity and bought it first. Figured out how to use it after-after. I was one of the dudes who helped figure out how to best utilize this ‘new tool’ in the warfighters toolbox.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Also: thank you for writing about your experiences and sharing your perspective. I wish more military guys would do this, and am very grateful that you are doing it.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.