27 thoughts on “L2 Guidance on Podcasts”

  1. If I am understanding those geniuses correctly they are telling their sycophants to turn their backs forever on any podcaster who ‘triggers’ them even once.

    I find that guidance interesting as well as troubling but I don’t have a site to defend so maybe their situation is somehow unique?

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply

    1. Talking about WheelTug is totally acceptable to me 🙂

      Many people nowadays are very easily offended. I don’t get it. Robin and I used to make it a point to watch Bill Maher every week, in the interests of keeping our friends close and our enemies closer. I would still watch him, if I knew how to work the remote 🙂

      It’s too bad that some conservatives are starting to be easily offended. Not a good look.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

      1. (Prior reply got eaten…). Very interesting, indeed, considering that at least one who now opines on L2 considered the concept of speech codes anathema for adults who would be capable of self-monitoring; as well, the idea of “safe spaces” was unnecessary there, because a broad range of viewpoints\opinions was welcomed/encouraged by design. Not to mention that it was often dismissed as laughable. Hence, “Hmmmm…”.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. BDB, primarily…I’d had some familiarity with another of his venues on hiatus from L1, before L2 came to be.

        Like

  6. “Not to mention that it was often dismissed as laughable.”

    What does this use of the word it mean here, please?

    I do not love breaking code, btw.

    Like

    Reply

    1. The concept of “safe spaces”, when it first came on the scene, was laughed off as only fit for kiddos with stuffed animals/security blankets, etc. Now, it’s being recommended. Ironic, at best, disingenuous, at worst. (I had no intention of providing you a code-breaking challenge; hope this reply solves the current one.) Am off to read/pray/sleep, in that order; g’night/g’day, chao for now, back later on: Peace, out.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. “…the concept of speech codes anathema for adults who would be capable of self-monitoring; as well, the idea of “safe spaces” was unnecessary there, because a broad range of viewpoints\opinions was welcomed/encouraged by design.”

        I’m counting as many as 5 or 6 things that ‘it’ could have been standing-in for. Thanks for clarifying for us in the short bus.

        Like

      2. Clarification gladly provided; I traveled on short buses for much of my own educational transportation – and made good friends then, too.

        Liked by 1 person

  8. We need, as a nation, to muscle up some of these white mostly peaceful rioters. Recommend they spend some time on the farm under the gentle tutelage of either of my grandfathers.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  11. And while we are on the topic, J. Walker says he rarely predicts the future, although he sees it quite clearly apparently, so as not to give the surprise away to those of us with less intelligence – or something like that.

    Can one of the L2 lurkers ask his Royalness if he can tell us what the day after the Presidential election looks like in majority-black urban projects/ neighborhoods? That could be useful information for us lesser human beings.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.