Want to argue about whether or not the DOD’s going from the .45 to the 9mm pistol was a lowering of military standards to accommodate both women and beta males?
Since the USMC grunts with support from the other branches (including Coast Guard) had conquered the entire globe by the end of the 1990s, a permanently apex-lethal US military had become a SJW’s biggest headache to cure.
P.S. The ‘trigger pullers,’ ‘snake eaters,’ grunts and combat engineers make up probably .0001% of the DOD. The rest is just support.
ST UnWoked & UnVaxxed! 
Photo of me being bewildered by the variety at a Chilean seafood market during Pinochet’s time at the top of the military junta.
Gracias a Chile, to this day I know more Spanish than English words when it comes to seafood.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Simon! Affirmative action and lowered standards make it possible for a few women to qualify for positions in the military they would otherwise never qualify for. Then, civilian women are told that female soldiers who depend on affirmative action and lowered standards are better than we are, and more patriotic than we are, and we all have to do whatever they say, because they served and we didn’t.
90% of women in the military do not want to be in combat positions. They want to support, not replace, the men who fight. But the 10% who want to be in combat are messing things up for everybody
LikeLike
more like the ‘less than 1%’ who want to be in combat are…
LikeLike
I am sure you are right. The vast majority of military women want to stay in support positions, but the media is always pushing the women who want to be in combat, and totally disregarding everyone else.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It really shouldn’t matter what any woman thinks, though. If male combat veterans want women in their ranks, and if male combat veterans believe that they would be more effective with women fighting alongside them, then fine, but the decision should be made by men who have actually fought, not by feminazis.
LikeLiked by 1 person