Home Sweet Home (2 of x)
Euclid has had a good long run, nearly a
century, as any reader who ever practiced
land use law can attest. But now, it is the
single-family “private house” that is more
likely to be looked on as the “mere parasite,” “The Zombie That is Single-Family
Zoning — Destroy It Before It Destroys
Us” screamed Forbes Real Estate Council,
(LeBlanc, May 4, 2021), and, they’re just
not cool: See Justin Fox, “Single-Family
Zoning is Weird,” Bloomberg Quint (Jan.
18, 2020).
Ironically, if this trend continues, the only
people allowed to live in “single-family”
detached dwellings will be people without
families: childless people over 55, since
discrimination on the basis of those criteria
is expressly permitted in “senior communities” under the federal Housing for Older
Persons Act (1995).
It isn’t only single-family residential zoning
that is coming under critical scrutiny; it’s
the core concept of zoning itself. See, e. g.,
“Land Use Regulation: What’s It Worth
Anyway?” (https://www.urban.org/debates/land-use-regulation-whats-it-worthanyway). It’s sad to think my treasured
(and expensively maintained) volumes of
Ryan’s Pennsylvania Zoning Law and Practice may soon be relegated to the back of
the stacks, no more relevant than dusty
treatises on enfeoffment and the fee tail.
The Way We Were
The single-family detached dwelling
district has, for a long time, been the
jewel in the crown of every municipality’s
zoning ordinance: R-1, the “highest” use
class category.
Time was, the residents of private houses in
residential districts could be relied upon to
zealously resist any incursions. When I first
began practicing zoning law, people within
a quarter mile away from some even
slightly denser proposed residential or
commercial use could be counted upon to
throng the zoning hearings, dressed as if for
church and filled with the gospel of property values. (I’m looking at you, Townships
Radnor and Lower Merion!) And to appear
as counsel for a developer before certain
zoning hearing boards (All hail, Lower
Gwynedd!) was to sit in the chair behind
the little imitation-wood nameplate engraved “Devil’s Advocate.”

“…dressed as if for church and filled with the gospel of property values.”
Preach it Padre!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Classic Hypatia 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Next is the small family farmer as is already happening in Netherlands, maybe Germany(?) as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They don’t want anyone to own any kind of land. Even someone with just a small yeard is a threat to them, because you can grow a lot of food and even raise a few chickens in a small yard. Land makes people more self sufficient. They don’t want that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am going to hire myself out as static security head honcho on the family farm back in SEMO in case the Feds come a’knocken.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I ❤️That, “SEMO”like here we say “NEPA”. Go STATES’ RIGHTS!!!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
To put a finer point on it SEMO’s ‘Bootheel’
LikeLike
Cool your jets losers. It’s a joke. I am too old for fighting, only loving on the agenda.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LOL 🙂 Too funny 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
No way my jets be coolin’
LikeLiked by 2 people
Lol 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for this Simon!
See, the Progs don’t want anybody to know what they’re doing.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This is unbelievably evil.
https://petersweden.substack.com/p/dutch-farmers-buyout?publication_id=547128&isFreemail=true
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pretty basic—control the food supply and you control the populace.
LikeLike