There are no and have never been any good waves of feminism because their movement has nothing to do with equality but is merely about exacting revenge against fate for hitting them with the ugly stick.
In other words, because they are not beautiful, cute or sexy femiNAZIs demand restitution as well as retribution from people who have never done anything to harm them. Unfortunately they have been quite successful due to the support from beta males who hope their “simping” will lead to getting some.
Change my military mind.
Finally, the end state of American feminism is the total collapse of Western Civilization and we are well on our way to that eventuality.
It had to be said. Have a great day.
ST UnWoked & UnVaxxed! 
Traditional and/or conservative women need to demand that all (American) women lose their suffrage until their combat casualties figures equal that of (white) men.
Just sayen’
LikeLiked by 2 people
Agreed. The problem, though, is that just as upper class men have no problem sending lower class men to fight wars, upper class women will do the same thing to lower class women. My beautiful and crazy feminist aunt started telling me when I was five years old that I would have to fight in wars because according to her, if women wanted equal rights, then they would have to take on equal responsibilities. My beloved aunt, bless her, had no intention of taking on these responsibilities: she wanted other, younger women to do it.
So, I say, NO to women voting, and NO to women going into combat, period and end of story. Women are not and never will be men, and men are not and never will be women: we cannot take on each other’s responsibilities. Men can’t have babies, and women can’t win wars, and that’s ok.
I know it is commonly said that feminists are just mad that they aren’t pretty, but I have known too many feminists way prettier than me, my gorgeous aunt being the prime example. She had boyfriends coming out of her ears: she could have easily married any time she wanted, but she was just kind of crazy. I just think they are all kind of crazy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In some Christian circles, young men are beginning to stand up: they are clearly stating that they don’t want to marry career women. Thank God. If they had been around when I was younger, I would have made a bee line to whatever Church they belonged to. The only reason many or most young women pursue careers is because they are told by feminist parents and teachers that they will be far more attractive to men if they are financially independent. Young men who disagree with that assessment need to speak out, and some of them are speaking out, Thank God.
If and when it becomes crystal clear that having a career does not make women more attractive to men, you would be amazed by how quickly most women would lose interest in pursuing a career.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t like the turn this is taking. John Lennon’s song said “Woman is the Nigger of the World” but he was wrong. Nobody ever said “Repeal the 15th Amendment!” even at the height of the George Floyd hysteria and riots. We women are lower status than blacks. It’s bad enough the Left wants to eliminate us ( it’s only one short step now to “There’s no such thing as a biological woman”) but now the Rightly Guided are getting into the act? Think it over, please my dears.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hypatia, I totally understand that what Simon and I are saying will sound very wild to a lot of people,but. Black men have to sign up for the draft. If WWIII breaks out, Black men will be expected to fight. Women currently don’t have to deal with those expectations and requirements, and I hope we never do. I care very deeply about women, and I totally recognize that in most of the World, women are not treated very well. Feminism has done next to nothing or nothing to help women who are truly suffering.
If a war breaks out, I don’t want to be at the front. If a ship goes down, I like to think that maybe some of the men on board would put women and children first. If I go on a date, I want the guy to pay for it-etc…most of these things are cultural, not political, and they are cultural practices that feminism is trying to destroy. The Judeo Christian ethic teaches that the strong must protect the weak: this means that men must protect women. We all fall short of that ideal, but the ideal is still a good one. It is an ideal that feminists are doing their best to destroy, in a million ways: through abortion, through the destruction of chivalry, through the way most feminists turn a totally blind eye to things like child sex trafficking.
If American men ever decide that they want to oppress women, women being able to vote will mean absolutely nothing. Women could vote in Afghanistan until they couldn’t, and the same thing could happen here: the way to protect women is to cultivate cultural practices that protect both women and men. To protect women from being abused, and to protect men from being taken advantage of through things like affirmative action. I believe that men should protect women to the death if necessary, but men are not and cannot be the slaves of women. So, I think women should basically be a privileged class culturally, but have very little or no political power. That was how it was for hundreds of years in America, and it wasn’t totally perfect, but it worked, and it worked better than what we are doing now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hypatia, I think we are having a failure to communicate.
In my opinion women were better off before chivalry was dead and it seems that the women’s vote is what consistently puts the candidates I would never vote for in office and back in office. See Clinton, Bill; Obama, Barack; Biden, Joe.
Something seems to be going wrong and I am thinking it is time to debate radical solutions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Humans have brains that don’t care about our sex organs. We are equally capable of succeeding in what we endeavor to do. Mom loved staying at home, mowing the lawn, painting the house, sewing our clothes — while Dad worked 2 jobs.
My sister and I were never meant to stay at home. She married for 7 years and once divorced never married again. She was a small business owner for 30 years. I lasted all of 3 years at home caring for kids. My son is now a professor and my daughter is looking for a mid-management job.
When women went to work during WWII, we found that men were being paid more for the same job. When the men came home, they were given our jobs – even if we were better at doing the job than they were. Equal rights mean that if a woman does the job better, she keeps her job. Equal rights mean a woman staying a home is given the same respect as a woman who prefers to go out to work.
As far as voting is concerned, I’ve listened to men voting along party lines without investigating the politician. I’ve listened to women detail how much research we’ve done on a candidate — and many of us are conservative women.
Feminism was hijacked. It was supposed to be about equality, not killing babies and calling a guy a gal after mutilation surgery.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, floridaborne, for this detailed response. I don’t know the answer but I know that it is time for revolutionary not evolutionary change, and I am not advocating for a violent revolution but merely radical change.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Agreed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am looking at what is happening to Europe and I am blaming Merkel mainly and all of the betas who supported her. I don’t know what the answer is but I do know that there is no America as we knew it if women are not having babies and alpha males have no voice in matters except for the fighting and dying.
More of the same is not the answer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amen.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“There is no America as we knew it if women are not having babies…” Amen.
I always wanted kids, but I was also vehemently opposed to being a working mother, and I couldn’t marry a man who wanted me to be a working mother. I married Robin at 36, and he was clear from the get go that he wanted a traditional wife and a traditional life. I could have married probably at least several different men when I was younger, but I either knew for certain or strongly suspected that they were looking for an equal financial partner, and that was a deal breaker for me. If I had fallen in love with a man willing to support me while I was young, I would have had a bunch of kids. When I was a teenager, I used to tell my friends that I wanted 12 kids, and they made fun of me for that, but I meant it.
Telling young men that women ought to be equal financial partners, and that this will be no problem because they can always put the 1 or 2 kids that they might have at age 35 in daycare is a horrible idea. Women want to be supported financially, and they are far far far more likely to have babies with a man who supports them financially. On the most important level, it isn’t even about money: I would take a poor guy who is willing to support me over a rich guy who isn’t every single time, and I did. Robin was poor when I met him, and he never became rich, but he was willing to sacrifice for me, and I respected that. I could have married probably several different men who made a lot more money than Robin did, but they would have demanded that I work and work hard, outside the home, even if there were kids, and I just can’t live with a man like that. I would rather be poor and childless and married to a man whom I Love and respect, which I was with Robin, than rich and dropping my kids off at daycare every morning thinking about how much I hate my rich husband who is making me do this.
I have no regrets. Given the circumstances I was in, I don’t know what else I could have done, but I want young people to be in better circumstances than I was in.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry to keep going on about this, but it really hits home for me, and this is one area where it really takes men to step up: if a group of generally attractive young men announce that they don’t want their wives to work, some women-more than enough women-will flock to them. They will also take a great deal of flak, and they will be attacked by some people, but more than enough women will love them, and they will do just fine.
If, in a culture where men are silent on this issue-as they seemed to be when I was younger-a group of generally attractive women announce that they don’t want to work and they want their husbands to support them, they will be savagely attacked and laughed at, and even men who lean traditional might consider them too bossy and too demanding. At best-at the absolute best-such women will be advised to marry rich men, and they will be laughed off and waved off. Even older men can’t really do much: if older men speak out, they will be dismissed as old fashioned.
This is a huge cultural problem that only young men can fix, which is why I am so happy about the younger guys who are loudly talking about how they don’t want to marry career women. Those young guys give me so much hope.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am hoping with this OP to help get this topic out of the shadows and into the public arena. It is not as if I want to keep women barefoot and pregnant. Well maybe just pregnant but well shod.
My honest to God concern is that our current trajection ensures that we will be annexed by the House of Islam.
See Sweden, Malmo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much, Simon, for speaking out on this issue! There is no America without Americans.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Humanist feminism thumbs its nose at sexual complementarity. Voting means being willing to have true “skin in the game” – i.e. Drafting into community service a la VISTA/Teach for America, etc. Women need to be registered for non-combat selective service. Home-making recognized as “working”. More later…..
LikeLiked by 1 person
See, this is the sticking point. Women do not need to be registered for any kind of selective service. Doing that would only make the problems we have now with women in the military much, much worse.
American men, by and and large, are great people, and they have proven time and again that they can be trusted to do what is right for America-most of them, anyway. The entire concept of women voting is based on the idea that men cannot be trusted. It encourages hostility between men and women, and it also encourages men to abandon responsibility-because why should things like chivalry even exist at all if men and women are totally equal?
I don’t want to vote, and I sure as hell do not want to serve in the military in any capacity in order to gain the right to vote, a “right” which I do not want. First, we told young women that they all had to go get careers, because men could not be trusted. Now, we are going to tell them that they all have join the military to protect themselves from American men? To earn the right to protect themselves from American men? I’m sorry, but I don’t think so.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even if American women signed up to serve in support roles, Simon very specifically stated that women should not be voting until they are serving in combat roles and incurring the same casualty rates as men. Which wouldn’t be difficult, if we didn’t care whether we won wars or not-just send women to the front, and who cares whether they actually win the battle or not. Then, maybe, we could all be totally equal. We wouldn’t be America anymore, but we would finally have total equality.
Enough with this madness. Women voting is, at best, a very temporary fix in places like Afghanistan. In a place like America, it’s a cure that is far worse than the disease.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My comment about female casualties is intentionally ad absurdum.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, but it does matter: being in the rear with the gear is not the same as being tip of the spear. We don’t need every woman in America telling us that she earned the right to vote by being a file clerk somewhere. Enough already.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right, JaC: Enough with talking past each other on this one. The devil truly is in the details.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It is so good to see you back on the blog, Nanda! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
If we can not even have the discussion we will never iron out the details.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Making my point:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/no-one-benefits-more-from-the-destruction-of-the-american-family-than-the-democratic-party
LikeLiked by 2 people
Timely article; published just today.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for the informative graph, Simon. Men do so much, and put up with so much, and feminism gives them zero credit for anything. This cannot go on, and it won’t. Patriarchy is inevitable. The only question is, what kind of patriarchy will we have? I would like one in which women have a great deal of influence-not power, necessarily, but influence on the men with power.
If women turn a blind eye to men’s suffering and sacrifice, we will end up with a patriarchy in which men will be far more likely to turn a blind eye to women’s suffering and sacrifice. I don’t want that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I stole the line about patriarchy being inevitable from Pastor Michael Foster. He runs a Church in Ohio, and he is on Twitter. He gave me permission to use that line anytime, and he said that I didn’t have to credit him for it, but I really feel that I should. It’s a great line, and it’s also totally true.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jesse Waters covered the article you provided a link for, Simon, on his show tonight. I was very suspicious of him when he replaced Tucker Carlson, but he is doing pretty well covering topics no one else wants to touch.
Leftists want as many people as possible to remain single: they want men to be demoralized, which is why they are always bashing men, and they want women to be angry and miserable. They want to destroy marriage because they want to destroy America.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why did the Obama campaign create the “Life of Julia” but not the “Life of John Doe?”
I rest my case (for now).
LikeLike
The reason that women should not be allowed to vote until they are also subject to the draft is straight forward:
Sixty-eight percent of unmarried women vote for the wrong candidate and if something is not done about it sooner rather than later they will take all of us down with them, no matter how altruistic their intentions. I rest my case your Honorificness.
LikeLike
More evidence of why women voting will be the death of Western Civilization and the American way of life.
https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2023/08/10/angry-young-men-are-going-to-disrupt-the-garbage-paradigm-n2626783
LikeLike
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/4125661-high-school-boys-are-trending-conservative/
LikeLike